Eugene.Zelenko added a comment. In D71594#1789275 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71594#1789275>, @goncharov wrote:
> In D71594#1788194 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71594#1788194>, @Eugene.Zelenko > wrote: > > > Where set of Clang-tidy checks come from? .clang-tidy? Could stricter set > > of custom rules be used? > > > Yes, clang-tidy uses the .clang-tidy. Do you want to enable additional rules > for a subproject? It really depends on state of each project. There are a lot of legacy issues, but it makes sense to treat new code with more demands, for example with respect to modernize checks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71594/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71594 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
