probinson added a comment. > "DW_TAG_unspecified_type auto" should be emitted for the function > declared/defined as auto returnning. Do you have other test cases in mind, > where above points diverges ??
The declaration would have DW_AT_type point to DW_TAG_unspecified_type, but the definition should have DW_AT_type use the actual type (which is now known, because you have the definition). The "actual type" might be "void", in which case the definition would omit DW_AT_type, just like a normal (non-auto) function that returns void. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70524/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70524 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
