svenvh marked 2 inline comments as done. svenvh added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/OpenCLBuiltins.td:51 +// Extension associated to a builtin function. +class FunctionExtension<string _Ext> : AbstractExtension<_Ext>; + ---------------- Anastasia wrote: > Are we planning to add type extensions too? If not it might not be worth > creating extra abstractions. :) Yes, type extensions are planned. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/OpenCLBuiltins.td:1095 // OpenCL v2.0 s9.17.3: Additions to section 6.13.1: Work-Item Functions +def FuncExtKhrSubgroups : FunctionExtension<"cl_khr_subgroups">; let MinVersion = CL20 in { ---------------- Nicola wrote: > Should this be moved together with the other extensions defined above? It > might make the file easier to navigate if all the extensions are in the same > place (or all close to where they are used) I'll move it to the top for now. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71476/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71476 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits