hfinkel added a comment. In D71241#1786959 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71241#1786959>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> In D71241#1786530 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71241#1786530>, @ABataev wrote: > > > Most probably, we can use this solution without adding a new expression. > > `DeclRefExpr` class can contain 2 decls: FoundDecl and the Decl being used. > > You can use FoundDecl to point to the original function and used decl to > > point to the function being called in this context. But at first, we need > > to be sure that we can handle all corner cases correctly. > > > What new expression are you talking about? To be clear, I believe he's talking about the new expression that I proposed we add in order to represent this kind of call. If that's not needed, and we can use the FoundDecl/Decl pair for that purpose, that should also be considered. > This solution already does point to both declarations, as shown here: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D71241#1782504 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71241/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71241 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
