hfinkel added a comment. In D71241#1782668 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71241#1782668>, @ABataev wrote:
> ... >> While we talk a lot about what you think is bad about this solution it seems >> we ignore the problems in the current one. Let me summarize a few: >> >> - Take https://godbolt.org/z/XCjQUA where the wrong function is called in >> the target region (because the "hack" to inject code in the wrong definition >> is not applicable). > > No time for it, just short answers. No definition for the variant - no > definition for the base. Are the variants not permitted to be external functions? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71241/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71241 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
