keryell added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaSYCL.cpp:44
+
+class KernelBodyTransform : public TreeTransform<KernelBodyTransform> {
+public:
----------------
Feel free to add more comments in this area up to line 103.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaSYCL.cpp:417
+      Util::DeclContextDesc{clang::Decl::Kind::ClassTemplateSpecialization,
+                            "accessor"}};
+  return matchQualifiedTypeName(Ty, Scopes);
----------------
After more thought, perhaps the solution proposed by Victor Lomüller during the 
last SYCL upstreaming meeting about marking accessor classes with some 
attribute instead of detecting concrete type names is a better generic approach.
I am more convinced now by his argument allowing more experimenting with 
alternative runtimes, since it looks like it is the only place we detect type 
names. For example the kernels are marked with an attribute in the runtime 
instead of concretely detecting the `parallel_for()` functions and so on.


================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGenSYCL/device-functions.cpp:2
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple spir64 -fsycl-is-device -S -emit-llvm %s -o - | 
FileCheck %s
+
+template <typename T>
----------------
Missing description about the purpose of this test


================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaSYCL/fake-accessors.cpp:2
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -I %S/Inputs -fsycl-is-device -ast-dump %s | FileCheck %s
+
+#include <sycl.hpp>
----------------
Missing description about the purpose of this test.
I am struggling about understanding what this test is for...
OK, after coming back later, I think I got it. I was confused by the fact that 
in the kernels you are using both true accessors (A, B & C) *and* some objects 
with names similar to SYCL accessor.
Is it possible to have some tests without true accessors?


================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaSYCL/mangle-kernel.cpp:3
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple spir-unknown-unknown-unknown -I %S/Inputs -I 
%S/../Headers/Inputs/include/ -fsycl-is-device -ast-dump %s | FileCheck %s 
--check-prefix=CHECK-32
+#include <sycl.hpp>
+#include <stdlib.h>
----------------
Missing description about the purpose of this test


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D71016/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D71016



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to