NoQ added a comment. Usually this kind of code is hard to re-use because all use cases require different definitions of "has descendant". We already have at least 3 such definitions floating around and we can't re-use them.
Even in the world of ASTMatchers the actual `hasDescendant` matcher is basically an anti-pattern as you always want to use a matcher for a //specific// parent-child relation instead (cf. http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-September/063260.html). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70805/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70805 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
