poelmanc added a comment. In D70144#1745583 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70144#1745583>, @JonasToth wrote:
> In D70144#1745532 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70144#1745532>, @malcolm.parsons > wrote: > > > Should `clang::format::cleanupAroundReplacements()` handle this instead? > > > Of yes. Totally forgot that. That would probably the most elegant way :) Interesting, so is the advantage of that approach that //any// fixit Replacement or Insertion that ends with a semicolon would have it removed if a semicolon already immediately follows it? That makes sense - once less thing for individual check developers to worry about. I can take a look at doing that. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70144/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70144 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
