ekatz added a comment. In D69935#1741268 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69935#1741268>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D69935#1739235 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69935#1739235>, @dblaikie wrote: > > > +1 to this & then it seems fine (probably without a committed test, but I > > wouldn't mind a copy/paste of clang's behavior before/after this patch > > posted to this review to demonstrate what is being fixed) > > > Waiting on this bit. I described an expected behavior in D69935#1739871 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69935#1739871>. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69935/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69935 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
