On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvand...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 February 2016 at 23:35, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Can a compiler tell if a copy constructor or destructor is trivial >> from the class declaration without function body? > > Yes, the mere presence of the declaration suffices to render it > non-trivial (unless explicitly declared "= default" like I did with > the default constructor, in which case there's no function body).
How about this? An empty type is a type where it and all of its subobjects (recursively) are of class, structure, union, or array type. An empty type may only have static member functions, default constructor, default copy constructor, default copy assignment operator or default destructor. No memory slot nor register should be used to pass or return an object of empty type. -- H.J. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
