ABataev added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:4011 unsigned NamedModifiersNumber = 0; - SmallVector<const OMPIfClause *, OMPC_unknown + 1> FoundNameModifiers( - OMPD_unknown + 1); + SmallVector<const OMPIfClause *, unsigned(OMPC_unknown) + 1> + FoundNameModifiers(unsigned(OMPD_unknown) + 1); ---------------- jdoerfert wrote: > ABataev wrote: > > jdoerfert wrote: > > > ABataev wrote: > > > > JonChesterfield wrote: > > > > > I wonder if it would be worth wrapping the accesses to > > > > > FoundNameModifiers in functor that does the enum class to unsigned > > > > > conversion. E.g. a class instance that contains the small vector and > > > > > exposes operator[] that takes the enum class. > > > > > > > > > > FoundNameModifiers[unsigned(val)] is quite a lot of line noise. > > > > Why `map`? It can be represented as a simple c-style array without any > > > > problems. > > > No, these are not enums that auto-convert to unsigned. > > Convert them manually. Replacing the simple hash array with map does not > > look like a good solution. > I feel this this is a micro optimization that will make the code less > maintainable and, as Jon noted, "FoundNameModifiers[unsigned(val)] is quite a > lot of line noise.". > Take a look at the first version and let me know if you want to go back to > that one for this part, if so, I can do that. You already introduced special wrapper class in the same file, maybe you can reuse for implicit conversions? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
