jroelofs added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17456#357245, @bcraig wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17456#357232, @jroelofs wrote: > > > > The private redirector symbol names are all prefixed with _CXX_* so that > > > they won't conflict with user symbols, > > > > > > This is more @mclow.lists/@ericwf's domain, but I think __libcxx_ prefixes > > would be safer (so that there's no chance of clashing with libstdc++, if > > they decide to do something similar, or already have). > > > Do we need our headers to coexist with the headers from other C++ > implementations? That seems fraught with peril. I've tried to do something > like that in the past with STLPort in combination with various compilers' > STLs, and ADL basically made the results unusable. I think the headers are a lost cause. It's the symbols I'm actually worried about. There are people who link against both standard libraries (and that's a valid, supported use case). http://reviews.llvm.org/D17456 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
