On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Ismail Donmez via cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Author: nico >> Date: Thu Feb 18 19:52:46 2016 >> New Revision: 261297 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=261297&view=rev >> Log: >> Implement the likely resolution of core issue 253. >> >> C++11 requires const objects to have a user-provided constructor, even for >> classes without any fields. DR 253 relaxes this to say "If the implicit >> default >> constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be required." >> >> clang is currently the only compiler that implements this C++11 rule, and >> e.g. >> libstdc++ relies on something like DR 253 to compile in newer versions. This >> change makes it possible to build code that says `const vector<int> v;' >> again >> when using libstdc++5.2 and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG >> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60284). >> >> Fixes PR23381. > > Since nearly all Linux distros now ship gcc5, it would be nice to have > this fix in 3.8 release.
Richard, what do you think? _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
