Aren't include-fixer and clang-include-fixer the same thing? Why do we have to entries for it?
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:48 PM Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Author: Aaron Ballman > Date: 2019-10-30T13:48:26-04:00 > New Revision: 0de262d7189c68897e8328d891d3daaf3aab3156 > > URL: > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0de262d7189c68897e8328d891d3daaf3aab3156 > DIFF: > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0de262d7189c68897e8328d891d3daaf3aab3156.diff > > LOG: Move this release note to its appropriate location; NFC. > > Added: > > > Modified: > clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst > > Removed: > > > > > ################################################################################ > diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst > b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst > index d2819258f17e..e6ef3cd5af0d 100644 > --- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst > +++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst > @@ -130,17 +130,17 @@ Improvements to clang-tidy > - The 'objc-avoid-spinlock' check was renamed to > :doc:`darwin-avoid-spinlock > <clang-tidy/checks/darwin-avoid-spinlock>` > > -Improvements to include-fixer > ------------------------------ > - > -The improvements are... > - > - New :doc:`readability-redundant-access-specifiers > <clang-tidy/checks/readability-redundant-access-specifiers>` check. > > Finds classes, structs, and unions that contain redundant member > access specifiers. > > +Improvements to include-fixer > +----------------------------- > + > +The improvements are... > + > Improvements to clang-include-fixer > ----------------------------------- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
