kristof.beyls added inline comments.

================
Comment at: docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:84
+  In a future release of Clang, we intend to change the default to
+  ``-fno-lax-vector-conversions``.
+
----------------
efriedma wrote:
> rsmith wrote:
> > efriedma wrote:
> > > And if you want to allow your code to build with both clang-9 and 
> > > clang-10, you have to do version detection in your build scripts?
> > I guess you'd detect whether the compiler supports 
> > `-flax-vector-conversions=all`, and pass that if so, and otherwise pass 
> > `-flax-vector-conversions`. Well, either that or you fix your code to not 
> > rely on lax vector conversions between int and float vectors. If your code 
> > builds with GCC, you did that already (they never supported lax conversions 
> > between float and int vectors, as far as I can tell).
> > 
> > Do you have a preferred alternative?
> All the alternatives are terrible in their own way:
> 
> 1. This status quo, which breaks compatibility with previous versions of clang
> 2. We could make -flax-vector-conversions mean the same thing as earlier 
> versions of clang.  So the flag wouldn't have the same meaning as gcc's flag.
> 3. Some mix of the previous options: we could wait until there are one or two 
> released versions that support -flax-vector-conversions=all , then change the 
> meaning of -flax-vector-conversions.  But I have no idea how we would decide 
> on a timeline.
> 
> I ran into this issue recently updating our compiler.  That said, the code in 
> question was only using the implicit conversion in a couple places by 
> accident, so it was easy enough to just fix the source.
Maybe adding an entry in the release notes about this change could help with 
making option 1 slightly more palatable?
My guess is that option 1 is the right one for the long term (compatibility 
between gcc and clang so code is more portable between both compilers).


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to