arsenm added a comment.

In D69494#1722868 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69494#1722868>, @ABataev wrote:

> In D69494#1722867 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69494#1722867>, @arsenm wrote:
>
> > In D69494#1722853 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69494#1722853>, @ABataev wrote:
> >
> > > Tests?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In D69494#1722853 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69494#1722853>, @ABataev wrote:
> >
> > > Tests?
> >
> >
> > This is NFC and doesn't change any behavior. The test for the convergent 
> > attribute is already handled in nvptx_parallel_codegen.cpp
>
>
> Nope, you're narking some calls withe the new attribute. It is not NFC in 
> this case.


More precisely, this is marking the function declarations with the attribute. 
These were already marked with the attribute. This just moves it into the 
helper function. D69495 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69495> adds new instances of 
the attribute


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69494/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69494



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to