ABataev added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntime.cpp:3799-3806
@@ -3780,4 +3798,10 @@
   OffloadEntriesInfoManager.registerTargetRegionEntryInfo(
       DeviceID, FileID, ParentName, Line, OutlinedFn, OutlinedFnID);
 }
 
+/// \brief Emit the num_teams clause of an enclosed teams directive at the
+/// target region scope. If there is no teams directive associated with the
+/// target directive, or if there is no num_teams clause associated with the
+/// enclosed teams directive, return nullptr.
+static llvm::Value *
+emitNumTeamsClauseForTargetDirective(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
----------------
sfantao wrote:
> ABataev wrote:
> > I don't understand why global var is not captured in target region. If it 
> > is not implemented yet, it must be implemented. If it is not captured, it 
> > must be captured in Sema. We should not introduce some function/other 
> > objects to find a workaround for 'not implemented' features.
> Sorry, I was not clear in my comment. It is not that globals are not captured 
> in target regions - they are, we already have Sema doing that. 
> 
> My point is that exactly because we capture globals in target regions the 
> magic that `OMPCapturedExprDecl` introduces does not work for that specific 
> case. So, if we have something like:
> 
> ```
> int Gbl;
> 
> foo() {
>   #pragma omp target
>   #pragma omp teams num_teams(Gbl)
>   {}
> }
> ```
> when the DeclRefExpr for Gbl used in num_teams is emitted in the scope that 
> encloses '#pragma omp target', it will crash because Gbl is not a local and 
> is marked as refer to enclosing capture. 
> 
> If I got it right, a solution based on `OMPCapturedExprDecl` basically makes 
> local declarations whose initializers are the expression we are interested 
> in. In the cases that  `OMPCapturedExprDecl` is currently employed we don't 
> have globals being captured and that is why it works fine.
> 
> It is likely I am missing something here. Let me know if you need me to 
> provide more details.
> 
> Thanks!
It should not crash, because if it is captured, we must use captured version of 
this variable, passed in arguments to outlined function


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17019



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to