hliao added a comment.

In D69124#1713427 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69124#1713427>, @tra wrote:

> This is... rather oddly-structured output. My brain refuses to accept that 
> the most-indented phase is the input.
>  Perhaps we should do `llvm::errs().indent(MaxIdent-Ident)`. This should give 
> us something like this (withMaxIdent=9), which is somewhat easier to grok, 
> IMO:
>
>       0: input, "/home/michliao/dummy.cpp", cuda, (host-cuda)
>        1: preprocessor, {0}, cuda-cpp-output, (host-cuda)
>         2: compiler, {1}, ir, (host-cuda)
>   3: input, "/home/michliao/dummy.cpp", cuda, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>    4: preprocessor, {3}, cuda-cpp-output, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>     5: compiler, {4}, ir, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>      6: backend, {5}, assembler, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>       7: assembler, {6}, object, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>        8: offload, "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda:sm_30)" {7}, object
>        9: offload, "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda:sm_30)" {6}, assembler
>   10: input, "/home/michliao/dummy.cpp", cuda, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>    11: preprocessor, {10}, cuda-cpp-output, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>     12: compiler, {11}, ir, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>      13: backend, {12}, assembler, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>       14: assembler, {13}, object, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>        15: offload, "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda:sm_60)" {14}, object
>        16: offload, "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda:sm_60)" {13}, assembler
>         17: linker, {8, 9, 15, 16}, cuda-fatbin, (device-cuda)
>          18: offload, "host-cuda (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)" {2}, 
> "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda)" {17}, ir
>           19: backend, {18}, assembler, (host-cuda)
>            20: assembler, {19}, object, (host-cuda)
>


As the top-level actions are the last actions to be performed, they should have 
no indentation

In D69124#1713427 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69124#1713427>, @tra wrote:

> This is... rather oddly-structured output. My brain refuses to accept that 
> the most-indented phase is the input.
>  Perhaps we should do `llvm::errs().indent(MaxIdent-Ident)`. This should give 
> us something like this (withMaxIdent=9), which is somewhat easier to grok, 
> IMO:
>
>       0: input, "/home/michliao/dummy.cpp", cuda, (host-cuda)
>        1: preprocessor, {0}, cuda-cpp-output, (host-cuda)
>         2: compiler, {1}, ir, (host-cuda)
>   3: input, "/home/michliao/dummy.cpp", cuda, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>    4: preprocessor, {3}, cuda-cpp-output, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>     5: compiler, {4}, ir, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>      6: backend, {5}, assembler, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>       7: assembler, {6}, object, (device-cuda, sm_30)
>        8: offload, "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda:sm_30)" {7}, object
>        9: offload, "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda:sm_30)" {6}, assembler
>   10: input, "/home/michliao/dummy.cpp", cuda, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>    11: preprocessor, {10}, cuda-cpp-output, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>     12: compiler, {11}, ir, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>      13: backend, {12}, assembler, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>       14: assembler, {13}, object, (device-cuda, sm_60)
>        15: offload, "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda:sm_60)" {14}, object
>        16: offload, "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda:sm_60)" {13}, assembler
>         17: linker, {8, 9, 15, 16}, cuda-fatbin, (device-cuda)
>          18: offload, "host-cuda (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)" {2}, 
> "device-cuda (nvptx64-nvidia-cuda)" {17}, ir
>           19: backend, {18}, assembler, (host-cuda)
>            20: assembler, {19}, object, (host-cuda)
>


it's difficult to choose a proper `MaxIdent` though to avoid unnecessary 
leading whitespaces or misalign the output. How about we draw the tree edges in 
the original output? It looks much easier for me to identify sibling actions.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69124/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69124



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to