SouraVX added a comment.
Hi @probinson @dblaikie @aprantl , I've was investigating and working on your
inputs regarding the problem with DW_at_defaulted once. I think clang has also
some issues. Though I'm not able to precisely point out. I ranned into some
problems in CFE while marking out_of_class functions. i.e consider this for
instance "debug-info-defaulted-out_of_class.cpp" FIXME:. Causing too much
trouble and possibly can introduce some bugs in clang/llvm.
May be we'll reconsider this in future. Thanks for putting time in reviewing
and discussing this.
Anyway here's the next course of action I'm considering. I'll be marking this
review as abandoned. I'll raise a fresh new review for DW_AT_deleted feature,
that;s pretty straight forward, considering C++ spec. If it's deleted, it has
to be declared/defined{whatever} deleted in it's first declaration. This
feature also augments the consumer information regarding which spl member
functions are deleted, hence restrict their calling for user or do something
useful with this at it's disposal.
@probinson @dblaikie @aprantl Please share your thoughts/comments inclination
regarding adding this DW_AT_deleted to clang/llvm.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68117/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68117
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
