klimek added a comment. In D68554#1707540 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68554#1707540>, @thakis wrote:
> > Could you or anyone else point me to a good example, I'd definitely like > > to take a look. > > http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/include/llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h/rSMDiagnostic -- > > > `via clang-format?` did you mean via clang.exe or clang-check.exe? I > > did think of this when I started doing this work, I just came to the > > conclusion that if I did that it wouldn't be long before someone requested > > the same features in clang-format itself. > > Err, via clang-tidy. Sorry, that was a super confusing typo. That seems like > a great place for this feature to me. clang-tidy is a compiler tool that needs the full compile info, while clang-format is just a parser; I think it'd be actively confusing to have clang-tidy be a clang-format frontend given how different there usage is. That said, I agree it's worth looking into using LLVM Diags without all of Clang's overhead. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68554/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68554 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
