alexfh added a comment. In D68682#1706581 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68682#1706581>, @poelmanc wrote:
> Thanks, from the name that sounds like the perfect place to do it. If > `cleanupAroundReplacements` also is used by clang-format, would we want to > make the functionality optional, e.g. via a new bool parameter to > `cleanupAroundReplacements`, a new option in FormatStyle, etc.? cleanupAroundReplacements is not used by clang-format itself. I believe, it's a part of clang-format only because it was easier to implement it on top of some infrastructure clang-format provides. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68682/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68682 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
