ymandel added a comment.

In D68876#1706131 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68876#1706131>, @gribozavr wrote:

> WDYT about `clang::transformer`? I don't see much point in the intermediate 
> namespace. However, LGTM either way.


Thanks for the review. I prefer `clang::transformer` but wasn't sure about 
ettiquete of introducing new namespaces under `clang`. If that's ok, then I'm 
happy to update.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D68876/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D68876



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to