Btw, thanks to nlewycky to pointing this out. -- Sean Silva
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Sean Silva via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: silvas > Date: Tue Feb 16 20:08:19 2016 > New Revision: 261053 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=261053&view=rev > Log: > [AttrDocs.td] Fix up some reST syntax. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td > > Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td?rev=261053&r1=261052&r2=261053&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td Tue Feb 16 20:08:19 2016 > @@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ The ``not_tail_called`` attribute preven > > For example, it prevents tail-call optimization in the following case: > > - .. code-block: c > + .. code-block:: c > > int __attribute__((not_tail_called)) foo1(int); > > @@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ For example, it prevents tail-call optim > > However, it doesn't prevent tail-call optimization in this case: > > - .. code-block: c > + .. code-block:: c > > int __attribute__((not_tail_called)) foo1(int); > > @@ -1789,7 +1789,7 @@ However, it doesn't prevent tail-call op > > Marking virtual functions as ``not_tail_called`` is an error: > > - .. code-block: c++ > + .. code-block:: c++ > > class Base { > public: > @@ -1839,7 +1839,7 @@ For example: > > Marking virtual functions as ``disable_tail_calls`` is legal. > > - .. code-block: c++ > + .. code-block:: c++ > > int callee(int); > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
