Author: rnk
Date: Tue Feb 16 13:16:28 2016
New Revision: 260994
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260994&view=rev
Log:
Exclude PCH/missing-file.cpp on Windows, it does not pass reliably
Tag the test with "REQUIRES: can-remove-opened-file", which is what we
use for the similar test Modules/explicit-build-missing-file.cpp.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp?rev=260994&r1=260993&r2=260994&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/PCH/missing-file.cpp Tue Feb 16 13:16:28 2016
@@ -4,16 +4,15 @@
// RUN: echo 'struct S{char c; int i; }; void foo() {}' > %t.h
// RUN: echo 'template <typename T> void tf() { T::foo(); }' >> %t.h
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -emit-pch -o %t.h.pch %t.h
-
-// %t.h might be touched by scanners as a hot file on Windows,
-// to fail to remove %.h with single run.
-// FIXME: Do we really want to work around bugs in virus checkers here?
-// RUN: rm %t.h || rm %t.h || rm %t.h
+// RUN: rm %t.h
// Check diagnostic with location in original source:
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -include-pch %t.h.pch -emit-obj -o %t.o %s 2> %t.stderr
// RUN: grep 'could not find file' %t.stderr
+// Oftentimes on Windows there are open handles, and deletion will fail.
+// REQUIRES: can-remove-opened-file
+
void qq(S*) {}
#ifdef REDECL
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
