NoQ added a comment. In D67140#1659774 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140#1659774>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> I don't think it's a requirement (so long as the diagnostics are clear about > the issue being diagnosed, I'm happy enough), but I think it's good for a > tool to be self-consistent in its messaging. It's jarring that one part of > the compiler emits diagnostics one way and another emits them a totally > different way. It may be less of an impact for people who don't see the > output from both at the same time, but that happens to be the use case I have. Unfortunately i think at this point many clients who tried to integrate multiple tools resorted to "Automatic Message Recapitalization" (c). For that reason we probably can harmlessly decapitalize Static Analyzer messages. I suspect that it won't really change anything either, because most tools will still be afraid of accidental inconsistencies in the compiler. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
