*nod* I figure at least include them into something :) -eric
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:31 PM Artem Belevich <t...@google.com> wrote: > No problem. It's hard to test CUDA wrappers properly without real CUDA > headers. :-( > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Eric Christopher <echri...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Ah thanks. Since my running the test suite yesterday didn't notice, >> perhaps a test would be appropriate as well. :) >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, 12:31 PM Artem Belevich via cfe-commits < >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Author: tra >>> Date: Fri Feb 12 14:26:43 2016 >>> New Revision: 260719 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260719&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Added missing '__'. >>> >>> Modified: >>> cfe/trunk/lib/Headers/__clang_cuda_cmath.h >>> >>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Headers/__clang_cuda_cmath.h >>> URL: >>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Headers/__clang_cuda_cmath.h?rev=260719&r1=260718&r2=260719&view=diff >>> >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Headers/__clang_cuda_cmath.h (original) >>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Headers/__clang_cuda_cmath.h Fri Feb 12 14:26:43 2016 >>> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ using ::nanf; >>> using ::nearbyint; >>> using ::nextafter; >>> __DEVICE__ float nexttoward(float __from, float __to) { >>> - return __builtin_nexttowardf(from, to); >>> + return __builtin_nexttowardf(__from, __to); >>> } >>> __DEVICE__ double nexttoward(double __from, double __to) { >>> return __builtin_nexttoward(__from, __to); >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cfe-commits mailing list >>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >>> >> > > > -- > --Artem Belevich >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
