Anastasia added a comment. In D65744#1639175 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65744#1639175>, @mantognini wrote:
> I think this looks good. Maybe the tests should be extended to test `auto` as > function return type, and if there's some special handling around > `decltype(auto)`, then it should be tested too, but I'm not sure it's > actually needed here. What do you think? Do you mean anything specific to test? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65744/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65744 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
