NoQ accepted this revision. NoQ added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Yay thanks!! In my understanding "check" is a feature of the tool, while "checker" is an entity within the tool that implements that feature. In most cases there's no difference, though, so yeah, it's a tradition thing. I generally enjoy being able to say things like "Malloc //checker// (singular!) provides //checks// (plural!) for use-after-free bugs and memory leaks". Also i believe that "check" in `checkPreCall` is a verb, so yeah, it should be kept. > a fundamental difference in between the analyzer and clang-tidy Honestly, i'm much more worried about message capitalization :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
