gribozavr marked an inline comment as done.
gribozavr added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/GlobList.cpp:46
+GlobList::GlobList(StringRef Globs) {
+ do {
+ GlobListItem Item;
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> NIT: I suggest using `for (;!Globs.empty();) {}` to make the stop condition
> stand out more.
> Not a big deal, though, feel free to keep as is
It is actually important for the algorithm to use a do-while loop... The
linked-list-based code always parsed at least one glob, even if the input
string is empty. Therefore, new loop-based code should also parse at least one
glob.
I added a doc comment:
```
+ /// An empty \p Globs string is interpreted as one glob that matches an empty
+ /// string.
GlobList(StringRef Globs);
```
Please let me know if that is not sufficient. There are also tests for this
behavior.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66788/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66788
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
