paulkirth updated this revision to Diff 215938.
paulkirth edited the summary of this revision.
paulkirth added a comment.

- Update CodeGenOptions to remove -fmisexpect
- Access the LLVMContext directly
- Add -line-tables-only for more accurate diagnostics

Fixes various issues with tests and cleans up some residual code from the 
original frontend implementation


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324

Files:
  clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def
  clang/test/Profile/Inputs/misexpect-switch-default.proftext
  clang/test/Profile/misexpect-branch.c
  clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch-default.c
  clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch-only-default-case.c
  clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch.c
  llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/MisExpect.cpp

Index: llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/MisExpect.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/MisExpect.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/MisExpect.cpp
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
               mdconst::dyn_extract<ConstantInt>(MD->getOperand(i));
           RealWeights[i - 1] = Value->getZExtValue();
         }
-        misexpect::verifyMisExpect(&I, RealWeights, I.getParent()->getParent()->getContext());
+        misexpect::verifyMisExpect(&I, RealWeights, I.getContext());
       }
     }
   }
Index: clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch.c
+++ clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // Test that misexpect detects mis-annotated switch statements
 
 // RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/misexpect-switch.proftext -o %t.profdata
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only
 
 int sum(int *buff, int size);
 int random_sample(int *buff, int size);
Index: clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch-only-default-case.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch-only-default-case.c
+++ clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch-only-default-case.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // Test that misexpect emits no warning when there is only one switch case
 
 // RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/misexpect-switch-default-only.proftext -o %t.profdata
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -fmisexpect
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only
 
 // expected-no-diagnostics
 int sum(int *buff, int size);
Index: clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch-default.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch-default.c
+++ clang/test/Profile/misexpect-switch-default.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // Test that misexpect detects mis-annotated switch statements for default case
 
-// RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/misexpect-switch.proftext -o %t.profdata
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect
+// RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/misexpect-switch-default.proftext -o %t.profdata
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only
 
 int sum(int *buff, int size);
 int random_sample(int *buff, int size);
@@ -17,26 +17,24 @@
 int main() {
   init_arry();
   int val = 0;
-
-  int j, k;
-  for (j = 0; j < outer_loop; ++j) {
-    for (k = 0; k < inner_loop; ++k) {
-      unsigned condition = rand() % 5;
-      switch (__builtin_expect(condition, 6)) { // expected-warning-re {{Potential performance regression from use of __builtin_expect(): Annotation was correct on {{.+}}% of profiled executions.}}
-      case 0:
-        val += sum(arry, arry_size);
-        break;
-      case 1:
-      case 2:
-      case 3:
-      case 4:
-        val += random_sample(arry, arry_size);
-        break;
-      default:
-        __builtin_unreachable();
-      } // end switch
-    }   // end inner_loop
-  }     // end outer_loop
+  int j;
+  for (j = 0; j < outer_loop * inner_loop; ++j) {
+    unsigned condition = rand() % 5;
+    switch (__builtin_expect(condition, 6)) { // expected-warning-re {{Potential performance regression from use of __builtin_expect(): Annotation was correct on {{.+}}% of profiled executions.}}
+    case 0:
+      val += sum(arry, arry_size);
+      break;
+    case 1:
+    case 2:
+    case 3:
+      break;
+    case 4:
+      val += random_sample(arry, arry_size);
+      break;
+    default:
+      __builtin_unreachable();
+    } // end switch
+  }   // end outer_loop
 
   return 0;
 }
Index: clang/test/Profile/misexpect-branch.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Profile/misexpect-branch.c
+++ clang/test/Profile/misexpect-branch.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // Test that misexpect detects mis-annotated branches
 
 // RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/misexpect-branch.proftext -o %t.profdata
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only
 
 #define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
 #define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 int bar() {
   int rando = buzz();
   int x = 0;
-  if (likely(rando % (outer_loop * inner_loop) == 0)) { // expected-warning-re {{Potential performance regression from use of __builtin_expect(): Annotation was correct on {{.+}}% of profiled executions.}} expected-remark-re {{Potential performance regression from use of __builtin_expect(): Annotation was correct on {{.+}}% of profiled executions.}}
+  if (likely(rando % (outer_loop * inner_loop) == 0)) { // expected-warning-re {{Potential performance regression from use of __builtin_expect(): Annotation was correct on {{.+}}% of profiled executions.}}
     x = baz(rando);
   } else {
     x = foo(50);
Index: clang/test/Profile/Inputs/misexpect-switch-default.proftext
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ clang/test/Profile/Inputs/misexpect-switch-default.proftext
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+main
+# Func Hash:
+8712453512413296413
+# Num Counters:
+9
+# Counter Values:
+1
+20000
+20000
+4066
+11889
+0
+0
+4045
+0
+
+
Index: clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def
===================================================================
--- clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def
+++ clang/include/clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.def
@@ -169,7 +169,6 @@
                                    ///< enable code coverage analysis.
 CODEGENOPT(DumpCoverageMapping , 1, 0) ///< Dump the generated coverage mapping
                                        ///< regions.
-CODEGENOPT(MisExpect , 1, 0) ///< Validate __builtin_expect with PGO counters
 
   /// If -fpcc-struct-return or -freg-struct-return is specified.
 ENUM_CODEGENOPT(StructReturnConvention, StructReturnConventionKind, 2, SRCK_Default)
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to