Hi, On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 11 February 2016 at 12:40, Matthijs van Duin wrote: > > You never define "POD for the purposes of layout", and I can only > > interpret it as being equivalent to "standard-layout". > > As Richard pointed out, it's defined in the C++ ABI. Which is C++y as well (and hence doesn't in itself solve the C/C++ compatibility we should strive for in the ABI). I'll concur with Matthijs and think that trivially copyable is the correct distinction for passing without registers (in addition of it being clearer than a strangly defined concept of "POD-but-not-quite-POD"). Do you think different? Are there non-trivially copyable examples that we'd wish to pass without registers as well? Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
