On 11 February 2016 at 15:00, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > I intentionally exclude C++ specific features in my propose.
Yet you use a definition from the Itanium C++ ABI which itself depends on multiple definitions in a particular version of the C++ standard, which depend on C++ specific features. This makes no sense to me. Note that triviality of copying/destruction holds for all C types and is easy to formulate in languages other than C++. (As is the notion of an aggregate requiring no storage, other than padding. The whole argument about array parameters seems a bit silly since this is mere syntax sugar, C/C++ do not support passing an actual array by value.) Matthijs van Duin _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
