dschuff added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/wasm-varargs.c:104
+
+struct S test_zero_size_struct(char *fmt, ...) {
+  va_list va;
----------------
This should maybe be called "test_empty_struct" since its size is actually 1 
and not zero.


================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/wasm-varargs.c:115
+
+// CHECK: define void @test_zero_size_struct([[STRUCT_S:%[^,=]+]]*{{.*}} 
noalias sret [[AGG_RESULT:%.*]], i8*{{.*}} %fmt, ...) {{.*}} {
+// CHECK:   [[FMT_ADDR:%[^,=]+]] = alloca i8*, align 4
----------------
could use CHECK_LABEL here and above.


================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/wasm-varargs.c:125
+// CHECK:   store i8* [[ARGP_NEXT]], i8** [[VA]], align 4
+// CHECK:   [[R0:%[^,=]+]] = bitcast i8* [[ARGP_CUR]] to [[STRUCT_Z]]*
+// CHECK:   [[R1:%[^,=]+]] = bitcast [[STRUCT_Z]]* [[U]] to i8*
----------------
It looks like most of the output (up to here) is boilerplate for va_arg setup 
and duplicates the CHECKs above. It might be more clear if we just omitted the 
duplicated stuff and only CHECK for the things that are different from the 
above test.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D66255/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D66255



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to