ABataev added a comment. In D66247#1630245 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66247#1630245>, @jdenny wrote:
> In D66247#1630196 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66247#1630196>, @ABataev wrote: > > > Do we really need to map such variables? According to standard, "The map > > clause specifies how an original list item is mapped from the current > > task’s data environment to a corresponding list item in the device data > > environment of the device identified by the construct.", i.e. it does not > > map the variable, but "specifies" how to map it. > > > What you're asking for now contradicts what you asked for at > https://reviews.llvm.org/D65835#1624659 when I asked about the same example > of `target map(a)` enclosing `teams private(a)`. Seems to me I did not expressed my idea absolutely correctly. I meant that if the variable is really mapped, then the maptype must be generated in all cases. If we do not need to map the variable, just like in these case, there definitely should not be maptype. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66247/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66247 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
