ro added a comment. In D64793#1613063 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64793#1613063>, @rnk wrote:
> lgtm > > If I interpret @jyknight correctly, having failed to dissuade you, he doesn't > feel strongly enough about this to block it, he just wants to reduce legacy > when feasible. Fully understood: I tend to do the same in the Solaris GCC port as well, getting rid of old cruft every once in a while (like deprecating/removing support for old OS versions). If we misunderstood, he can still object while I'm working to get the prerequisite lldb (and polly) patches in. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64793/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64793 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
