jordan_rose added a comment. In D65256#1601509 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65256#1601509>, @rjmccall wrote:
> Sorry, am I missing something? Such a union would've been either ill-formed > or unavailable in ARC (depending on where it was declared) before this recent > work. Apparently that was not the case if it was in a system header. Instead, Clang marked the //member// unavailable rather than the entire union. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65256/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65256 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
