smeenai added a comment. In D64579#1581557 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64579#1581557>, @beanz wrote:
> Yea, this makes sense even if it is a bit sad. We do use the > `--whole-archive` approach for `libLLVM`, and it works. I was hoping to avoid > it here in part to free up the ability to link `libclang_shared` before or in > parallel to archiving the `libclang*.a` archives. Yeah, makes sense. I've had issues with static libraries getting reordered out of the `--whole-archive` with other projects in the past, which makes me wary of it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64579/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64579 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
