Probably not (unless someone corrects me). In that case, it can wait for the next release.
Thanks, Hans On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote: > Is PR25804 a regression? > > ~Aaron > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> It was requested that this be merged to 3.8 as it fixes PR25804. >> >> Manuel: does this look OK for the branch? >> >> Thanks, >> Hans >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Samuel Benzaquen via cfe-commits >> <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Author: sbenza >>> Date: Fri Feb 5 12:29:24 2016 >>> New Revision: 259898 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=259898&view=rev >>> Log: >>> [ASTMatchers] Allow hasName() to look through inline namespaces >>> >>> Summary: >>> Allow hasName() to look through inline namespaces. >>> This will fix the interaction between some clang-tidy checks and libc++. >>> >>> libc++ defines names in an inline namespace named std::<version_#>. >>> When we try to match a name using hasName("std::xxx") it fails to match and >>> the clang-tidy check does not work. >>> >>> Reviewers: klimek >>> >>> Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits >>> >>> Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15506 >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
