kadircet added a comment. In D63194#1553649 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63194#1553649>, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> The only suggestion from me would be maybe try moving this to a layer that > would also make also benefit other compilation-db-based things like > `clang-tidy`, etc? > Any ideas on how to do this? Would this potentially break anything? I've made it a wrapper for JSON-based compilation database(as inferring cdb does), there were no breakages in tests. Hopefully all clang-based tools can benefit from it by linking in target infos and enabling them at startup. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63194/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63194 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
