skan added a comment.

In D62115#1538631 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62115#1538631>, @kimgr wrote:

> I think the test needs a bit more work. It's essentially checking the same 
> thing twice to exercise the Windows path separators.
>
> It looks like there's already a test for `-H` in 
> `FrontEnd/print-header-includes.c`. That also demonstrates the use of 
> `--check-prefix` to handle target-specific stuff. Maybe you could fold this 
> into there?


Done


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62115/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62115



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to