skan added a comment. In D62115#1538631 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62115#1538631>, @kimgr wrote:
> I think the test needs a bit more work. It's essentially checking the same > thing twice to exercise the Windows path separators. > > It looks like there's already a test for `-H` in > `FrontEnd/print-header-includes.c`. That also demonstrates the use of > `--check-prefix` to handle target-specific stuff. Maybe you could fold this > into there? Done CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62115/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62115 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits