SjoerdMeijer updated this revision to Diff 202934.
SjoerdMeijer added a comment.

Hi Oliver, thanks for your comments!

This was the easy one, they have been added:

> I also don't see any tests for the negated forms of either feature.

The trouble begun with this:

> +fp.dp, but the FPU is already double-precision
>  +fp.dp, but no double-precision FPU exists (are there any FPUs which cause 
> this?)
>  +[no]fp or +[no]fp.dp for a CPU/arch which doesn't have any FPUs.

Because I found that basically none of this worked. The main reason was that we 
were always passing `generic`. To address that we at least have a chance of 
seeing a sensible CPU name, I have swapped the order of parsing -march and 
-mcpu. I.e., we parse -mcpu first, and pass that to `checkARMArchName`, which 
will eventually call `appendArchExtFeatures`. I think that makes more sense 
when we use the CPUname to query `getDefaultFPU`.

Then about the more fancy diagnostics (e.g. "fp.dp, but the FPU is already 
double-precision"): I've removed any attempt to throw clever diagnostics. I 
don't think, in general, that we provide this kind of service level. I.e., we 
need to do a lot more work here to avoid a meaningless, confusing, and thus 
useless  "--march=... not supported" error message when we provide +fp.dp on 
the -march when e.g. the CPU already enabled this.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697

Files:
  clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/ARM.cpp
  clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/ARM.h
  clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.c
  clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.s
  llvm/include/llvm/Support/ARMTargetParser.h
  llvm/lib/Support/ARMTargetParser.cpp

Index: llvm/lib/Support/ARMTargetParser.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Support/ARMTargetParser.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Support/ARMTargetParser.cpp
@@ -484,22 +484,85 @@
   return StringRef();
 }
 
-StringRef ARM::getArchExtFeature(StringRef ArchExt) {
-  if (ArchExt.startswith("no")) {
-    StringRef ArchExtBase(ArchExt.substr(2));
-    for (const auto AE : ARCHExtNames) {
-      if (AE.NegFeature && ArchExtBase == AE.getName())
-        return StringRef(AE.NegFeature);
-    }
+static bool stripNegationPrefix(StringRef &Name) {
+  if (Name.startswith("no")) {
+    Name = Name.substr(2);
+    return true;
   }
+  return false;
+}
+
+StringRef ARM::getArchExtFeature(StringRef ArchExt) {
+  bool Negated = stripNegationPrefix(ArchExt);
   for (const auto AE : ARCHExtNames) {
     if (AE.Feature && ArchExt == AE.getName())
-      return StringRef(AE.Feature);
+      return StringRef(Negated ? AE.NegFeature : AE.Feature);
   }
 
   return StringRef();
 }
 
+static unsigned findDoublePrecisionFPU(unsigned InputFPUKind) {
+  const ARM::FPUName &InputFPU = ARM::FPUNames[InputFPUKind];
+
+  // If the input FPU already supports double-precision, then there
+  // isn't any different FPU we can return here.
+  //
+  // The current available FPURestriction values are None (no
+  // restriction), D16 (only 16 d-regs) and SP_D16 (16 d-regs
+  // and single precision only); there's no value representing
+  // SP restriction without D16. So this test just means 'is it
+  // SP only?'.
+  if (InputFPU.Restriction != ARM::FPURestriction::SP_D16)
+    return ARM::FK_INVALID;
+
+  // Otherwise, look for an FPU entry with all the same fields, except
+  // that SP_D16 has been replaced with just D16, representing adding
+  // double precision and not changing anything else.
+  for (const ARM::FPUName &CandidateFPU : ARM::FPUNames) {
+    if (CandidateFPU.FPUVer == InputFPU.FPUVer &&
+        CandidateFPU.NeonSupport == InputFPU.NeonSupport &&
+        CandidateFPU.Restriction == ARM::FPURestriction::D16) {
+      return CandidateFPU.ID;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // nothing found
+  return ARM::FK_INVALID;
+}
+
+bool ARM::appendArchExtFeatures(
+  StringRef CPU, ARM::ArchKind AK, StringRef ArchExt,
+  std::vector<StringRef> &Features) {
+  StringRef StandardFeature = getArchExtFeature(ArchExt);
+  if (!StandardFeature.empty()) {
+    Features.push_back(StandardFeature);
+    return true;
+  }
+
+  const bool Negated = stripNegationPrefix(ArchExt);
+
+  if (CPU == "")
+    CPU = "generic";
+
+  if (ArchExt == "fp" || ArchExt == "fp.dp") {
+    unsigned FPUKind;
+    if (ArchExt == "fp.dp") {
+      if (Negated) {
+        Features.push_back("-fp64");
+        return true;
+      }
+      FPUKind = findDoublePrecisionFPU(getDefaultFPU(CPU, AK));
+    } else if (Negated) {
+      FPUKind = ARM::FK_NONE;
+    } else {
+      FPUKind = getDefaultFPU(CPU, AK);
+    }
+    return ARM::getFPUFeatures(FPUKind, Features);
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
 StringRef ARM::getHWDivName(unsigned HWDivKind) {
   for (const auto D : HWDivNames) {
     if (HWDivKind == D.ID)
Index: llvm/include/llvm/Support/ARMTargetParser.h
===================================================================
--- llvm/include/llvm/Support/ARMTargetParser.h
+++ llvm/include/llvm/Support/ARMTargetParser.h
@@ -240,6 +240,8 @@
 StringRef getSubArch(ArchKind AK);
 StringRef getArchExtName(unsigned ArchExtKind);
 StringRef getArchExtFeature(StringRef ArchExt);
+bool appendArchExtFeatures(StringRef CPU, ARM::ArchKind AK, StringRef ArchExt,
+                           std::vector<StringRef> &Features);
 StringRef getHWDivName(unsigned HWDivKind);
 
 // Information by Name
Index: clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.s
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.s
+++ clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.s
@@ -5,10 +5,24 @@
 # RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M < %t %s
 # RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+dsp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
 # RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_DSP < %t %s
+# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
+# RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_FP < %t %s
+# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nofp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
+# RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_FP < %t %s
+# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp.dp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
+# RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_FPDP < %t %s
+# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nofp.dp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
+# RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_FPDP < %t %s
 # RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
 # RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVE < %t %s
+# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nomve -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
+# RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVE < %t %s
+# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve+fp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
+# RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVE_FP < %t %s
 # RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
 # RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVEFP < %t %s
+# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nomve.fp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
+# RUN:      FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVEFP < %t %s
 
 .syntax unified
 .thumb
@@ -39,15 +53,21 @@
 # ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
 # ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
 # ERROR-V81M_DSP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
-# ERROR-V81M_MVE: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
-# ERROR-V81M_MVEFP: :[[@LINE-5]]:1: error
+# ERROR-V81M_FP: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
+# ERROR-V81M_MVE: :[[@LINE-5]]:1: error
+# ERROR-V81M_MVE_FP: :[[@LINE-6]]:1: error
+# ERROR-V81M_MVEFP: :[[@LINE-7]]:1: error
 
 asrl r0, r1, r2
 # ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
 # ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
 # ERROR-V81M_DSP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
+# ERROR-V81M_FP: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
+# ERROR-V81M_FPDP: :[[@LINE-5]]:1: error
 
 vcadd.i8 q0, q1, q2, #90
 # ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
 # ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
 # ERROR-V81M_DSP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
+# ERROR-V81M_FP: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
+# ERROR-V81M_FPDP: :[[@LINE-5]]:1: error
Index: clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.c
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.c
+++ clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.c
@@ -2,13 +2,48 @@
 // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-DSP < %t %s
 // CHECK-DSP: "-target-feature" "+dsp"
 
+// RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp  -### %s 2> %t
+// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FP < %t %s
+// CHECK-FP: "-target-feature" "+fp-armv8"
+// CHECK-FP-NOT: "-target-feature" "+fp64"
+// CHECK-FP-NOT: "-target-feature" "+d32"
+// CHECK-FP: "-target-feature" "+fullfp16"
+
+// RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nofp  -### %s 2> %t
+// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NOFP < %t %s
+// CHECK-NOFP: "-target-feature" "-vfp2" "-target-feature" "-vfp3" "-target-feature" "-fp16" "-target-feature" "-vfp4" "-target-feature" "-fp-armv8" "-target-feature" "-fp64" "-target-feature" "-d32" "-target-feature" "-neon" "-target-feature" "-crypto"
+
+// RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp.dp  -### %s 2> %t
+// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FPDP < %t %s
+// CHECK-FPDP: "-target-feature" "+fp-armv8"
+// CHECK-FPDP: "-target-feature" "+fullfp16"
+// CHECK-FPDP: "-target-feature" "+fp64"
+// CHECK-FPDP-NOT: "-target-feature" "+d32"
+
+// RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nofp.dp  -### %s 2> %t
+// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NOFPDP < %t %s
+// CHECK-NOFPDP: "-target-feature" "-fp64"
+
 // RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve  -### %s 2> %t
 // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-MVE < %t %s
 // CHECK-MVE: "-target-feature" "+mve"
 
+// RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nomve  -### %s 2> %t
+// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NOMVE < %t %s
+// CHECK-NOMVE: "-target-feature" "-mve"
+
 // RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp  -### %s 2> %t
 // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-MVEFP < %t %s
 // CHECK-MVEFP: "-target-feature" "+mve.fp"
 // CHECK-MVEFP-NOT: "-target-feature" "+fp64"
 
+// RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nomve.fp  -### %s 2> %t
+// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NOMVEFP < %t %s
+// CHECK-NOMVEFP: "-target-feature" "-mve.fp"
+
+// RUN: %clang -target arm-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+fp.dp  -### %s 2> %t
+// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-MVEFP_DP < %t %s
+// CHECK-MVEFP_DP: "-target-feature" "+mve.fp"
+// CHECK-MVEFP_DP: "-target-feature" "+fp64"
+
 double foo (double a) { return a; }
Index: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/ARM.h
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/ARM.h
+++ clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/ARM.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/Triple.h"
 #include "llvm/Option/Option.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/TargetParser.h"
 #include <string>
 #include <vector>
 
@@ -25,6 +26,8 @@
                             const llvm::Triple &Triple);
 const std::string getARMArch(llvm::StringRef Arch, const llvm::Triple &Triple);
 StringRef getARMCPUForMArch(llvm::StringRef Arch, const llvm::Triple &Triple);
+llvm::ARM::ArchKind getLLVMArchKindForARM(StringRef CPU, StringRef Arch,
+                                          const llvm::Triple &Triple);
 StringRef getLLVMArchSuffixForARM(llvm::StringRef CPU, llvm::StringRef Arch,
                                   const llvm::Triple &Triple);
 
Index: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/ARM.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/ARM.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/ARM.cpp
@@ -72,15 +72,13 @@
 
 // Decode ARM features from string like +[no]featureA+[no]featureB+...
 static bool DecodeARMFeatures(const Driver &D, StringRef text,
+                              StringRef CPU, llvm::ARM::ArchKind ArchKind,
                               std::vector<StringRef> &Features) {
   SmallVector<StringRef, 8> Split;
   text.split(Split, StringRef("+"), -1, false);
 
   for (StringRef Feature : Split) {
-    StringRef FeatureName = llvm::ARM::getArchExtFeature(Feature);
-    if (!FeatureName.empty())
-      Features.push_back(FeatureName);
-    else
+    if (!appendArchExtFeatures(CPU, ArchKind, Feature, Features))
       return false;
   }
   return true;
@@ -100,14 +98,16 @@
 // getARMArch is used here instead of just checking the -march value in order
 // to handle -march=native correctly.
 static void checkARMArchName(const Driver &D, const Arg *A, const ArgList &Args,
-                             llvm::StringRef ArchName,
+                             llvm::StringRef ArchName, llvm::StringRef CPUName,
                              std::vector<StringRef> &Features,
                              const llvm::Triple &Triple) {
   std::pair<StringRef, StringRef> Split = ArchName.split("+");
 
   std::string MArch = arm::getARMArch(ArchName, Triple);
-  if (llvm::ARM::parseArch(MArch) == llvm::ARM::ArchKind::INVALID ||
-      (Split.second.size() && !DecodeARMFeatures(D, Split.second, Features)))
+  llvm::ARM::ArchKind ArchKind = llvm::ARM::parseArch(MArch);
+  if (ArchKind == llvm::ARM::ArchKind::INVALID ||
+      (Split.second.size() && !DecodeARMFeatures(
+        D, Split.second, CPUName, ArchKind, Features)))
     D.Diag(clang::diag::err_drv_clang_unsupported) << A->getAsString(Args);
 }
 
@@ -119,8 +119,11 @@
   std::pair<StringRef, StringRef> Split = CPUName.split("+");
 
   std::string CPU = arm::getARMTargetCPU(CPUName, ArchName, Triple);
-  if (arm::getLLVMArchSuffixForARM(CPU, ArchName, Triple).empty() ||
-      (Split.second.size() && !DecodeARMFeatures(D, Split.second, Features)))
+  llvm::ARM::ArchKind ArchKind =
+    arm::getLLVMArchKindForARM(CPU, ArchName, Triple);
+  if (ArchKind == llvm::ARM::ArchKind::INVALID ||
+      (Split.second.size() && !DecodeARMFeatures(
+        D, Split.second, CPU, ArchKind, Features)))
     D.Diag(clang::diag::err_drv_clang_unsupported) << A->getAsString(Args);
 }
 
@@ -327,25 +330,12 @@
   if (ThreadPointer == arm::ReadTPMode::Cp15)
     Features.push_back("+read-tp-hard");
 
-  // Check -march. ClangAs gives preference to -Wa,-march=.
   const Arg *ArchArg = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_march_EQ);
+  const Arg *CPUArg = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mcpu_EQ);
   StringRef ArchName;
-  if (WaArch) {
-    if (ArchArg)
-      D.Diag(clang::diag::warn_drv_unused_argument)
-          << ArchArg->getAsString(Args);
-    ArchName = StringRef(WaArch->getValue()).substr(7);
-    checkARMArchName(D, WaArch, Args, ArchName, Features, Triple);
-    // FIXME: Set Arch.
-    D.Diag(clang::diag::warn_drv_unused_argument) << WaArch->getAsString(Args);
-  } else if (ArchArg) {
-    ArchName = ArchArg->getValue();
-    checkARMArchName(D, ArchArg, Args, ArchName, Features, Triple);
-  }
+  StringRef CPUName;
 
   // Check -mcpu. ClangAs gives preference to -Wa,-mcpu=.
-  const Arg *CPUArg = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mcpu_EQ);
-  StringRef CPUName;
   if (WaCPU) {
     if (CPUArg)
       D.Diag(clang::diag::warn_drv_unused_argument)
@@ -355,6 +345,20 @@
   } else if (CPUArg)
     CPUName = CPUArg->getValue();
 
+  // Check -march. ClangAs gives preference to -Wa,-march=.
+  if (WaArch) {
+    if (ArchArg)
+      D.Diag(clang::diag::warn_drv_unused_argument)
+          << ArchArg->getAsString(Args);
+    ArchName = StringRef(WaArch->getValue()).substr(7);
+    checkARMArchName(D, WaArch, Args, ArchName, CPUName, Features, Triple);
+    // FIXME: Set Arch.
+    D.Diag(clang::diag::warn_drv_unused_argument) << WaArch->getAsString(Args);
+  } else if (ArchArg) {
+    ArchName = ArchArg->getValue();
+    checkARMArchName(D, ArchArg, Args, ArchName, CPUName, Features, Triple);
+  }
+
   // Add CPU features for generic CPUs
   if (CPUName == "native") {
     llvm::StringMap<bool> HostFeatures;
@@ -620,11 +624,12 @@
   return getARMCPUForMArch(Arch, Triple);
 }
 
-/// getLLVMArchSuffixForARM - Get the LLVM arch name to use for a particular
-/// CPU  (or Arch, if CPU is generic).
-// FIXME: This is redundant with -mcpu, why does LLVM use this.
-StringRef arm::getLLVMArchSuffixForARM(StringRef CPU, StringRef Arch,
-                                       const llvm::Triple &Triple) {
+/// getLLVMArchSuffixForARM - Get the LLVM ArchKind value to use for a
+/// particular CPU (or Arch, if CPU is generic). This is needed to
+/// pass to functions like llvm::ARM::getDefaultFPU which need an
+/// ArchKind as well as a CPU name.
+llvm::ARM::ArchKind arm::getLLVMArchKindForARM(StringRef CPU, StringRef Arch,
+                                               const llvm::Triple &Triple) {
   llvm::ARM::ArchKind ArchKind;
   if (CPU == "generic") {
     std::string ARMArch = tools::arm::getARMArch(Arch, Triple);
@@ -640,6 +645,15 @@
                           ? llvm::ARM::ArchKind::ARMV7K
                           : llvm::ARM::parseCPUArch(CPU);
   }
+  return ArchKind;
+}
+
+/// getLLVMArchSuffixForARM - Get the LLVM arch name to use for a particular
+/// CPU  (or Arch, if CPU is generic).
+// FIXME: This is redundant with -mcpu, why does LLVM use this.
+StringRef arm::getLLVMArchSuffixForARM(StringRef CPU, StringRef Arch,
+                                       const llvm::Triple &Triple) {
+  llvm::ARM::ArchKind ArchKind = getLLVMArchKindForARM(CPU, Arch, Triple);
   if (ArchKind == llvm::ARM::ArchKind::INVALID)
     return "";
   return llvm::ARM::getSubArch(ArchKind);
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to