kuhar added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Analysis/Analyses/Dominators.h:111
+      assert(
+          (IDom && !IDom->getBlock() && *I == &(*I)->getParent()->getExit() &&
+           IsPostDom) ||
----------------
kuhar wrote:
> Szelethus wrote:
> > kuhar wrote:
> > > Assertions with multiple conditions conjoined are difficult to debug -- 
> > > perhaps it'd be better to split them and assign to separate booleans for 
> > > each condition, with descriptive names? This code can be hidden behind an 
> > > ifdef for debug. 
> > Do you like this better? I prefer running static analysis on large 
> > codebases with a Release+Asserts build, and I fear that this check will be 
> > lost if I use `#ifdef DEBUG`.
> I think it's much more readable now, thanks! Release+Asserts defines NDEBUG 
> and the assertion will work if you put it into an ifdef.
*does not define NDEBUG


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62551/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62551



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to