probinson added a comment. In D62202#1510414 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62202#1510414>, @dblaikie wrote:
> Technically this violates the LLVM style guide which says "make anonymous > namespaces as small as possible, and only use them for class declarations." > (preferring static for functions) - > https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#anonymous-namespaces Which argues for flagging it somehow. > But making code work for the compilers we say we support seems reasonable to > me. > > What's the compiler bug - can't handle static functions as non-type template > parameters in general? Are there other workarounds to consider? Correct, static function was not permitted as a non-type template parameter. https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/25334/error-code-c2971-when-specifying-a-function-as-the.html I'm not aware of other workarounds, but I don't claim to be deeply familiar with the darker corners of C++. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62202/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62202 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
