rsmith accepted this revision. rsmith added a comment. Yeah, this seems to match the library wording. (I think it's short-sighted and over-fitting -- this is baking into the library specification that the language happens to not allow unions to have base classes today -- but this isn't the venue for that discussion.)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61858/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61858 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
