Dmitry.Kozhevnikov added a comment. In D50993#1496946 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D50993#1496946>, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> I'd still put it into LLVM to avoid platform-specific code in clangd. > Maybe `std::abort()` in the added `...Async` function if threads are > disabled? It's a bit unusual, but would allow keeping this function where it > belongs. Yes, that’s probably a better way. I’ll be back at it in a few days. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D50993/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D50993 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
