phosek marked an inline comment as not done. phosek added a subscriber: rsmith. phosek added inline comments.
================ Comment at: libunwind/CMakeLists.txt:190 if(LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR AND NOT APPLE) - set(DEFAULT_INSTALL_PREFIX lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}/clang/${CLANG_VERSION}/${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}/) - set(LIBUNWIND_LIBRARY_DIR ${LLVM_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_INTDIR}/clang/${CLANG_VERSION}/${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}/lib${LIBUNWIND_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}) + set(LIBUNWIND_LIBRARY_DIR ${LLVM_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_INTDIR}/${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}/c++) + set(LIBUNWIND_INSTALL_LIBRARY_DIR lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}/${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}/c++) ---------------- jdenny wrote: > phosek wrote: > > jdenny wrote: > > > I naively assumed libunwind would have its own directory so it could be > > > selected independently. Does this mean any library for C++ goes in c++? > > We could do that, but I'm not sure if it's worth doing without a clear use > > case? Do you know of any client that would want to consume libunwind > > independently of other C++ libraries? I'm aware of Rust but they build > > libunwind independently so there's no need for this. > I'm afraid I have no idea. I'm not close enough to these libraries to be an > adequate reviewer by myself. Another reviewer should probably take a look at > the new version of the patch. @EricWF @rsmith is this something you have an opinion on (or can you recommend someone who might)? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits