rsmith added a comment.

> xbolva00 abandoned this revision.

Do you not want to pursue this any more?

This seems reasonable to me, and is in line with other cases where we have 
diagnostic flags as aliases to GCC's similar-but-not-quite-the-same flags (eg, 
GCC's `-Wnoexcept-type` doesn't fire in quite the same set of cases as clang's 
`-Wc++17-compat-mangling`, but we alias them; likewise for GCC 
`-Wsequence-point` versus Clang `-Wunsequenced`).


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58841/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58841



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D58841: [... Dávid Bolvanský via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D588... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D588... Dávid Bolvanský via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D588... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D588... Dávid Bolvanský via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D588... Dávid Bolvanský via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to