rsmith added a comment. > xbolva00 abandoned this revision.
Do you not want to pursue this any more? This seems reasonable to me, and is in line with other cases where we have diagnostic flags as aliases to GCC's similar-but-not-quite-the-same flags (eg, GCC's `-Wnoexcept-type` doesn't fire in quite the same set of cases as clang's `-Wc++17-compat-mangling`, but we alias them; likewise for GCC `-Wsequence-point` versus Clang `-Wunsequenced`). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58841/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58841 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits