probinson added a comment.

In D60283#1480546 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60283#1480546>, @aganea wrote:

> Thanks Paul, your solution is even better. I'll apply rL333311 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL333311> locally - if everything's fine, do you 
> mind if I re-land it again?


I suggest you do *not* use my patch unmodified, because it stops generating any 
checksums as soon as it finds one preprocessed file.  The functionality in your 
patch seems better, to skip checksums only for those files that look like they 
were preprocessed.   If you want to take my patch and remove the extra flag 
from CGDebugInfo that "remembers" that we've previously seen a file with line 
directives, that would be fine.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60283/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60283



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to