probinson added a comment. In D60283#1480546 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60283#1480546>, @aganea wrote:
> Thanks Paul, your solution is even better. I'll apply rL333311 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL333311> locally - if everything's fine, do you > mind if I re-land it again? I suggest you do *not* use my patch unmodified, because it stops generating any checksums as soon as it finds one preprocessed file. The functionality in your patch seems better, to skip checksums only for those files that look like they were preprocessed. If you want to take my patch and remove the extra flag from CGDebugInfo that "remembers" that we've previously seen a file with line directives, that would be fine. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60283/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60283 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits