nridge planned changes to this revision. nridge added a comment. In D59407#1478794 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59407#1478794>, @sammccall wrote:
> So if you can stomach it, I think > > > **Approach 2: Add a RelationSlab storing (subject, predicate, object) > > triples, intended for sparse relations*** > > is certainly fine with us (having spoken with @kadircet @ilya-biryukov > @sammccall @gribozavr - @hokein is on vacation but not nearly as stubborn as > I am!) Yep, I'm happy to move forward with that approach. Thanks for the guidance! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59407/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59407 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits