tejohnson marked an inline comment as done. tejohnson added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/test/tools/gold/X86/opt-level.ll:53 + ; CHECK-O1-OLDPM: select + ; The new PM does not do as many optimizations at O1 + ; CHECK-O1-NEWPM: phi ---------------- mehdi_amini wrote: > This is intended? I'm surprised the two PMs don't have the same list of > passes for a given opt level? I'm really not sure. I did compare the post-link LTO pipelines of both PMs at O0/O1/O2 and confirmed that the old PM is doing many more passes than the new PM at O1. Probably a question for @chandlerc ? In any case, I didn't want to address it here since it is orthogonal. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61022/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61022 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
